Cube vs Vena
Low cost, high ROI
Fast onboarding
Top rated in ease of use
Finance teams choose Cube because it’s fast, flexible, and intuitive – no consultants, no hidden code, no rigid templates. While Vena relies on outdated workflows, hidden coding syntax, and complex implementations, Cube empowers teams to move faster and own their models from day one.
Vena’s reporting is confusing
Vena relies on hidden scripts (VenaQL) to connect their system to spreadsheets, which means standard and ad-hoc reporting comes with steep learning curves and a risk of breaking every time you need to change a parameter or format.
Vena's collaboration is outdated
Vena’s file check-in/check-out system creates bottlenecks and version control issues, and their lack of compatibility with Macs and Google Sheets means lower adoption across the organization.
Vena’s implementation is complex
Vena’s hidden coding means they rely heavily on external consultants for configuration and maintenance, meaning long implementation timelines, increased costs, and limited flexibility.
Cube connects to your existing tech stack, including: ERP, CRM, HRIS, business intelligence, and more.
Spreadsheet agnostic compatibility (Google Sheets & Excel)
Excel-only compatibility
PC-only compatibility
System agnostic compatibility (PC & Mac)
Multiple integrations
Fast onboarding
Fast data consolidation
Ease of administration
Security
Outsourced customer support
Collaboration capabilities
Requires consultants / product experts who understand proprietary code
Fast report automation
No code integration with spreadsheets
Complex formula engine